ERNOP Newsletter July 2010
1. From the ERNOP board
2. ERNOP project manager
3. Member news
4. 2010 Global Philanthropy and Remittances Index
5. 2011: The European year of volunteering
6. Acquiring Funding for Research on Philanthropy throughout Europe
7. Altruism and social solidarity
1. From the ERNOP board – by Theo Schuyt
Since the third annual ERNOP meeting in February 2010 in Budapest, our research network has been transformed into a real “European Organization for European researchers in philanthropy”. We now have a board, a factsheet, membership fees and we are well-informed by the ERNOP newsletter every two months. We have left the status of “starter” and we have turned into an organization. There is a marketing slogan I would like to copy in this respect: we stand for a “Serious ERNOP, taken seriously”.
So, with this in mind, these past months the ERNOP board has worked on what every organization needs: a policy and a structure. We had conference calls, we developed strategy documents and formulated time paths. While doing so, we were strongly supported by our executive director dr. Pamala Wiepking and our project manager Marit Moll. On behalf of the ERNOP board it is a pleasure to present the policy goals for the next 5 year stage of ERNOP.
1. To establish ERNOP as a leading innovative and knowledgeable network of European interdisciplinary philanthropy researchers, spanning the European continent.
2. To secure the continuance of ERNOP, by acquiring structural funds and support for ERNOP.
3. To establish a Giving in Europe research project and to strive for the development of a database of European Philanthropy.
4. To make ERNOP a successful coordinating body of joined European research proposals, projects and publications.
5. To establish the annual ERNOP conference as the leading philanthropy conference in Europe.
6. To seek cooperation with existing journals, like the affiliation with Voluntary Sector Review that has been established.
Well, we are not overly ambitious, but we are ambitious! Fortunately, we have made a division of labor among our board members to reach as much targets as possible. An important first step is to establish ERNOP as an independent legal entity, which enables ERNOP-members to submit research-proposals, to get granted and to raise funds for ERNOP. In the autumn newsletter we hope to inform you about the progress on this topic. Also acquiring structural funding has high priority: we are using our contacts in Brussels and we are in consultation with our commercial partners as well. We will inform you as soon we can.
Let me finish on a personal note: our project manager Marit is expecting her first baby at the end of August. We hope everything will go well. When nice people get children, the world becomes a little bit of a nicer place to stay. Marit, we wish you all the best!
2. ERNOP project manager – saying hello and goodbye
I am happy to introduce myself to you in this newsletter item. My name is Marit Moll, Sociologist by training, an experienced social policy researcher (on the topic of volunteering among others) and project manager. Since January 1st of this year I work as a freelancer, taking on projects as they come along.
I have started the job of ERNOPs project manager in May and since then I have been in contact with many of you. My main tasks were to set up or streamline the practical aspects of the ERNOP organization, as the board has been working on the strategy and foundation of the organization. I have been happy to contribute to the growth and strengthening of ERNOP and I hope that the organization will continue to thrive.
But, as Theo indicated in the item above, I am about to go away on pregnancy leave. So this newsletter will be my final act as ERNOPs project manager for now. I might return in December, but that all depends on circumstances. In the mean time the project managers tasks will be carried out by Barry Hoolwerf and Brigitte Schouten of the VU University. You can reach them via the email address
projectmanager@ernop.eu.
It has been a pleasure to email with you and I hope that one day we will meet in person. Saying hello and goodbye in the same newsletter item, some might say that is efficiency to the extreme!!
3. Member news
New UK study: How Donors Choose Charities by Beth Breeze
This paper is concerned with the question of how donors select charitable beneficiaries, and the extent to which assessments of need are a factor in giving decisions. The study is based on interviews with 60 committed donors, representing a spread of gender, age and income levels.
There is a widespread belief that charities exist primarily to help needy people and that the desire to meet needs is a key criterion in the selection of charitable beneficiaries. However, this study finds that people do not give to the most urgent needs, but rather they support causes that mean something to them. In particular, the study finds four non-needs-based criteria that commonly influence donors’ decision-making:
1. Donors’ tastes, preferences and passions, acquired as a result of an individual’s social experiences. These motivate many giving decisions, even among donors who perceive themselves to be motivated by meeting needs.
2. Donors’ personal and professional backgrounds, which shape their ‘philanthropic autobiographies’ and influence their choice of beneficiaries.
3. Donors’ perceptions of charity competence, notably the efficiency with which they are believed to use their money, often judged on the basis of the quality and quantity of direct mail.
4. Donors’ desire to have a personal impact, such that their contribution makes a difference and is not ‘drowned out’ by other donors and government funding.
Given the voluntary nature of charitable activity, these are not surprising conclusions. Giving and philanthropy have always been supply-led rather than demand-driven: the freedom to distribute as much as one wants, to whom one chooses, is what distinguishes giving from paying tax. Yet the methods used to encourage donations tend to assume that philanthropy depends on objective assessments of need rather than on donors’ enthusiasms. The tendency to overestimate the extent to which people act as rational agents results in fundraising literature that often focuses on the dimensions and urgency of the problem for which funding is sought. The assumption underlying this approach is that donations are distributed in relation to evidence of neediness, when in fact much giving could be described as ‘taste-based’ rather than ‘needs-based’.
Theoretical models of decision-making are used to demonstrate that donors are restricted not only by the amount of money they have available to give away but also by limitations in their ability to gather information, cognitively process the merits of alternative recipients, and dedicate time to this decision-making process. The findings confirm that donors find it difficult to make decisions about charitable recipients, and that they use a range of strategies to assist their decision-making, including:
1. Constructing self-made classifications and ‘mental maps’ to help cope with the complexity of the charity sector.
2. Using heuristics, or ‘rules of thumb’, to filter potential charitable recipients.
3. Pre-assigning certain causes as intrinsically ‘worthy’ or ‘unworthy’ of support.
The paper concludes that a better understanding of donors’ rationalities is necessary for both policy-makers and fundraising practitioners, in order to avoid making erroneous assumptions about the meaning and motivation behind giving decisions.
Belgian contribution to new edition of Series on Volunteering across Europe (SPES)
This book offers an analysis of common features and major differences in volunteering landscape of EU countries based on a study of country reports realized within the SPES led research work “Volunteering across Europe. Organisations, promotion, participation”. The essay has the objective to focus on key features of volunteering activities in EU countries as described in the country reports, especially with regard to areas of activities and available objective data. The essay provides an insight into distinctive “European” features of voluntary action, based on comparative analysis.
Gijselinckx, C. & L. Hustinx (forthcoming), "Volunteering across Europe: similarities and specificities" in: SPES (ed), Volunteering across Europe. Organisations, promotion, participation, volume VI.
Call for papers special issue PMR: ‘Philanthropy and Public Policy’ – to be published November 2011
This special issue seeks to explore, encourage debate, and help shape understanding on the multiple ways in which philanthropic action (perceived in its broadest sense and including charitable giving and action) engages with, supports, and/or challenges public management and policy. Reflecting the international and interdisciplinary nature of PMR, we encourage a pluralist approach. We welcome submissions that address all national contexts as well as cross-national comparisons. Papers can be empirically based – using quantitative, qualitative, or mixed method approaches – or theoretical. Areas for consideration might include:
- How should philanthropy be theorised in relation to public policy development and change? Which existing theoretical lenses (e.g. innovation, resource management, power) help or hinder understanding of this developing linkage?
- Why, how and where do philanthropic organisations set out to make and lead on new or neglected public policy agendas and with what results?
- Why and how is public policy that encourages philanthropy being made? What characterises such policies (supportive vs oppositional?), who designs them, and what are the results?
- Can certain aspects of governmental spending be perceived/evaluated as ‘public philanthropy’?
- Where, how and why do the freedoms of philanthropic institutions encourage or discourage risk taking for social improvement? How, if at all, does this impact on public policy and action?
- To what extent does competition for philanthropic giving challenge or imbalance public policy goals and strategies (e.g. in the fields of health care and university education)?
- What kind of leverage for public policy change is achieved by philanthropic foundations with deliberately planned ‘limited lives’ or policies on ‘spending out’?
The guest editors of this special issue are Dr Tobias Jung (Centre for Charitable Giving and Philanthropy, University of Edinburgh Business School and Cass Business School, UK) and Prof Jenny Harrow (Centre for Charitable Giving and Philanthropy, Cass Business School, UK). Please contact
Tobias.Jung.1@city.ac.uk for any questions regarding this special issue.
The European Programme in Civil Society Leadership (EPICS)
In 2009, participants from CSOs across Europe took part in ‘The European Programme in Civil Society Leadership’ (EPICS). Based on its previous success, we are proud to announce the launch of the 2011 programme. Top-level leaders in European Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) identified a growing need among Civil Society leaders to challenge their own basic assumptions, develop their formal knowledge and expand their personal networks in the sector. EPICS has been designed to examine relevant strategic and managerial issues that CSO leaders and managers are facing today. With a firm base on frontline research and by incorporating practical experience, EPICS seeks to strengthen and enhance the strategic and analytical capacity of European Civil Society Organizations.
It is important to develop an understanding of the differences and similarities that exist among European CSOs. The EPICS initiative aims to foster joint perspectives as well as create a European identity among CSO decision and policy makers. Therefore, EPICS is offered by the following academic institutions:
1. Centre for Management and Organization - Stockholm School of Economics (Sweden)
2. Research Institute for Nonprofit Organisations - Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien (Austria)
3. Centre for Nonprofit Management - Trinity College Dublin (Ireland)
We believe that EPICS 2011 will build on participant’s prior learning and experience. Moreover it aims at providing a challenging environment and helping to build professional contacts and potential future strategic partners across Europe.
We would be pleased if you would spread this information among potentially interested persons. More programme details are available at
www.epics.info, in the adjoining EPICS folder or through the Academic Directors of the EPICS Programme: Gemma Donnelly-Cox, Michael Meyer or Filip Wijkström.
Second issue of Voluntary Sector Review
The second issue of Voluntary Sector Review, ERNOP’s official academic journal, will be published in July 2010. It contains the following mix of European, US and UK oriented papers.
Research
- Ingo Bode, Thinking beyond borderlines: A German gaze on a changing interface between society and the voluntary sector
- Dennis Young, Amanda Wilsker and Mary Grinsfelder, Understanding the determinants of nonprofit income portfolios
- Nick Acheson, Welfare State reform, compacts and restructuring relations between the state and the voluntary sector: reflections on Northern Ireland experience
- Ben Cairns, Mike Aiken and Romayne Hutchison, ‘It’s not what we do, it’s how we do it’: managing the tension between service delivery and advocacy
- Gareth G Morgan, The Use of charitable status as a basis for regulation of nonprofit accounting
Practice
- Andy Benson, Hackney Advice Forum: taking back the power
- Mark Rosenmann, Caring to Change
- S.R.B. Leadbeater, Anatomy of a crisis and lessons for Third Sector governing boards
Policy
- Alan Strickland, Volunteering, but not as we know it?
- Cathy Pharoah, A review of recent attempts to ‘reform’ the Gift Aid scheme of tax reliefs for individual giving in the UK
ERNOP’s membership package includes an offer of a 33% discount on the 2010 journal subscription for individual ERNOP members, who will pay 40 Euros (rather than the full price of 60 Euros). Request the discount by indicating that you are an individual ERNOP member when ordering via
http://www.portlandpress.com/pcs/journals/journal.cfm?product=VSR.
VSR is offering a free online trial of the journal to institutions for the whole of 2010. Institutional ERNOP members can sign up for this free trial by sending an email with your name and the address of your institution to
tpp-vsr-trial@bristol.ac.uk.
XV IRSPM Conference ‘Value, Innovation and Partnership’ – advance notice of conference panel
On April 11th – 13th 2011 the 15
th edition of the IRSPM Conference will take place in Dublin Ireland, during which the conference panel ‘Philanthropy, public services, policy: working together or falling out?’ will be organised by
Prof Jenny Harrow, Dr Tobias Jung, Prof Stephen P Osborne, Prof Susan Phillips, Dr Brid Quinn, Prof Chris Tapscott and Prof Mary Tschirhart. Please contact
Tobias.Jung.1@city.ac.uk for any questions regarding this panel. To submit an abstract and for further information about the conference, please visit
http://www.irspm2011.com/.
Panel Description: Partnerships and collaboration are frequently perceived as ‘machines of possibilities’ which offer solutions to wicked, multifaceted problems that cut across sectors and services. While traditionally the focus has been on partnerships between public and private sector organisations, global challenges and resource constraints have led to an increasing interest in partnerships between the public sector and philanthropy; policy makers, civil servants and the public are increasingly looking towards and are relying on philanthropy to contribute to and assist with the funding, design and provision of public services. The emerging relationships with philanthropy cover a wide spectrum of approaches. They range from the more formal, continuous models, such as the United States’ Partnership for Public Services with its focus on revitalising and transforming the way government works, to shorter policy interventions, as illustrated by the United Kingdom’s Fear and Fashion initiative with its interest in helping young people to stop carrying and using knives.
This panel explores the issues and questions that arise from partnerships and collaborations between philanthropy (perceived in its widest sense and including charitable organisations), public services and policy. It will focus on:
- gaining a better understanding of the nature of these relationship (e.g. heroic organisational bridging vs individual and organisational wariness/weariness; the impact on outcomes and performance);
- practical issues that arise from philanthropy – public sector/policy boundary spanning (e.g. individual and organisational differences in working contexts, communicative/culture clashes, managerial challenges, performance issues); and
- the wider challenges these changes represent in relation to democracy, power, influence, trust, accountability, mutual dependencies and the potential for collaborative disadvantage.
Religions and Philanthropy in the Mediterranean: artifacts, symbols, and material culture.
The Research Center PHaSI, with a grant of the Fondazione Roma Mediterraneo, is running a virtual exhibition titled Religions and Philanthropy in the Mediterranean: artifacts, symbols and material culture. The aim of the project is to create of a virtual museum where artworks, buildings, documents and objects are shown about the philanthropic tradition in the framework of the main monotheistic religion as well as of cultural and religious minorities in the Mediterranean. The project is based on an international networks of scholars, institutions, researchers, and experts from many of the Mediterranean countries. The virtual museum is expected to be opened late November 2010.
New CEPS study: Foundation awards
The Centre for Philanthropy Studies (CEPS) at the University of Basel has started a new research project on awards that are offered by foundations. The project is focused on the question; What criteria influence the importance of foundations awards in the target field and in the public in general. The aim is to reveal the core components of a successful award, including the components of the prize aspects of announcement, selection and the prize ceremony. A preliminary search has revealed more than 200 existing foundation awards in Switzerland. The project is supported by the Sophie und Karl Binding Foundation and Velux Foundation. First results will be available on the CEPS-website this autumn.
New PHaSI publications - GIVING: thematic issues in philanthropy and social innovation
GIVING 1/09. Published on March 2010 - “Community Philanthropy”
The issue - co-edited with the Center for Leadership and Public Value, University of Cape Town, South Africa – reflected on community philanthropy in practice with a view to surfacing current issues and themes. The issue highlights systems of community philanthropy, conceptual underpinnings and increasing rigour in contextualizing community philanthropy, and innovative works occurring within the sector with practical and widespread applications.
GIVING 2/09. Expected for September 2010 - “The territory as leverage of social aims and projects”
The issue is the result of a special project elaborated by The Research Center PHaSI concerning the city of Bologna and the surrounding area that aims to identify a main series of indexes that allow the analysis of those values, whether tangible or intangible, necessary for assessing the real needs of individuals and families in a given territory. In this issue will be published essays and studies of best practices and several articles written by experts of international renown.
New German study: Charitable Giving and Fundraising in a Tax Regime
A new study into Charitable Giving and Fundraising in a Tax Regime has been started by Dr. Friedrich Heinemann and Sarah Borgloh of ZEW and Prof. Berthold U. Wigger of the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. The study has been commissioned by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in Bonn.
On the market for charitable contributions three types of actors may be distinguished: First, donors make voluntary contributions to certain charitable causes. Second, charities provide collective goods which are financed by those contributions and at the same time charities influence giving behaviour by their fundraising activities. Third, the state is financially relieved by the private provision of collective goods and may foster charitable contributions through tax incentives.This project aims at exploring the interactions between these three actors in the setting of an extensive tax regime both theoretically and empirically. From a theoretical point of view, the focus is on the interaction between charities and benefactors. While donors have an interest in their contributions being completely used for the provision of the respective good, charities are likely to use a substantial amount of their revenues for fundraising activities. These diverging interests lead to strategic implications which impact the effects of tax incentives for donations. Empirically, the project is designed to evaluate the interaction of charities and donors within the framework of tax incentives with German data because there is a strong preoccupation of the literature with US data. There are only few empirical studies for countries like Germany, where social, cultural, scientific or religious public goods are financed mainly by taxes and contributions.
4. 2010 Index of Global Philanthropy and Remittances
Hudson Institute's Center for Global Prosperity as published its fifth annual Index of Global Philanthropy and Remittances, a comprehensive guide to global philanthropy and remittances from developed to developing countries. The Index can be downloaded for free from
www.global-prosperity.org.
Five years ago, when the first Index was published, the foreign aid establishment downplayed the importance of private giving. Now, almost every major international economic institution -from the U.S. State Department to the IMF and the World Bank- recognizes that private development aid is critical to prosperity in the developing world.
The 2010 Index includes:
- Data on 2008 U.S. philanthropy to developing countries, which held steady at $37.3 billion, compared to $36.9 billion in 2007;
- New philanthropy figures for 14 of 22 donor countries;
- Findings on philanthropy and remittances from the developed to the developing world which amounted to nearly twice as much as government aid ($233 vs. $121 billion);
- Reports on diaspora bonds, African small and medium enterprises, and philanthropy in emerging market economies.
Pamala Wiepking and several other ERNOP members have provided the Hudson Institute’s Index 2010 with figures on European philanthropy, partly based on the ERNOP publication “The State of Giving Research”. Pamala has visited the Hudson Institute in March 2010 and agreed upon facilitating collaboration between the Hudson Institute and ERNOP members, hopefully resulting in the inclusion of more (complete) figures on European Philanthropy in the 2011 Index. Because of the interest of the Hudson Institute in European Philanthropy, they have invited all ERNOP members attending the ARNOVA conference 2011 in Arlington to visit the Hudson Institute in Washington. More details on the collaboration and the visit to the Hudson Institute will follow later this year.
5. 2011: The European year of volunteering
The European Council has adopted the decision to designate 2011 as he "European Year of Volunteering". According to the Council, volunteering has a great, but so far under-exploited, potential for the social and economic development of Europe. Dedicating 2011 to the topic of volunteering will help Member States, regional and local communities and civil society achieve the following objectives:
1. Work towards an enabling and facilitating environment for volunteering in the EU;
2. Empower volunteer organisations and improve the quality of volunteering;
3. Reward and recognise volunteering activities; and
4. Raise awareness of the value and importance of volunteering.
Each Member State has been asked to designate a National Coordinating Body (NVB) that will be responsible for the planning, coordination and organisation of events. Activities will focus on communication and awareness-raising measures, such as conferences, seminars, exchange of experience and publications. The ownership of the European Year shall remain with the volunteers and the volunteer organisations, and many activities and celebrations will be organised from the bottom-up. The budget allocated for the European Year of Volunteering 2011 is EUR 8 million. An additional amount of EUR 3 million has also been allocated for preparatory actions during 2010.
For more information about the program and activities in your country, check http://ec.europa.eu/citizenship/focus/focus840_en.htm.
The Centre for Philanthropy Studies (CEPS) at the University of Basel is the official research partner of the Swiss national committee for the European Year of Volunteering 2011. During this year, the CEPS will support the Swiss national committee with data and facts on volunteering and will participate in several events. Furthermore, a qualitative study on volunteering is planned to be conducted in 2011. The CEPS is strongly interested in contacts with other research centre’s that will be involved in the European Year of Volunteering. Please contact Georg Schnurbein at
georg.vonschnurbein@unibas.ch.
6. Acquiring Funding for Research on Philanthropy throughout Europe – by René Bekkers
Both from a scientific and policy perspective, this is the time to acquire funding for research on philanthropy throughout Europe. In many social science disciplines, attention for philanthropy as a topic is growing. The number of journal articles published on philanthropy is growing faster than ever, and more and more articles appear in high-impact journals. From a policy perspective the economic downturn increases the relevance of philanthropy. Governments seek budget cuts that create a need for philanthropic funding of public goods that is greater than ever.
How can you take advantage of these opportunities? And how does ERNOP help you? First of all, we encourage all ERNOP members to write grant proposals. At the ERNOP website and in the newsletter you find upcoming competitions and deadlines. We gather this information from the funding bodies that we currently know about. These are primarily the European Research Council (ERC), the European Foundation Center (EFC), the European Science Foundation (ESF) and the Eighth Framework Programme of the European Union (FP8).
Organization | Call open | Call deadline |
ESF Research networking programs | July 1st 2010 | October 14th 2010 |
ESF exploratory workshops | March 8th 2010 | April 29th 2010 |
ESF research conferences | | September 15th 2010 |
FP7 and later on FP8 socio-economic sciences and humanities | No relevant call in 2010 | |
In addition to these grant opportunities from EU bodies, national and even local bodies in your country may also offer grants for international collaboration. For instance, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research offers grants for collaboration with and research visits of scholars from France and Germany. Cities like Amsterdam and Paris also fund international exchange programs. Please examine the grant programs of national organizations for possibilities of funding for international exchange, collaboration and conference organization that help ERNOP. Send the information you have to the ERNOP secretary at projectmanager@ernop.eu so that we can publish it on
www.ernop.eu.
A second role for ERNOP is assisting you in developing your research proposals, you can email
research@ernop.eu if you would like to receive assistance or if you would like to give assistance. The assistance starts in the first phase of putting together a team of researchers with whom you can work productively. You can announce your interest in participating in a working group to write a research proposal, and search the ERNOP network to find colleagues that could help. Also you find some general guidelines for writing proposals, on topics such as making an assessment of the chances of success before you start to work; getting support from your own university; insights in success and failure factors. In ERNOP we also share experiences from previous applications. By sharing insights gained throughout the grant writing process you contribute to the success of other ERNOP members. And as a member you can benefit from the experiences of your colleagues.
7. Altruism and social solidarity
Over the last three years, the American Sociological Association (ASA) has been building a section on altruism and social solidarity. This section has recently become in formation, and would like to invite all people interested to join. The section will organize a session at the ASA meeting in Chicago, August 2011, which you might find of interest. It is called “Current Perspectives on Altruism and Social Solidarity”, and the presenters include Paul Schervish (Boston College) and Christian Smith (Notre Dame University, Science of Generosity Project). For more information on the section and the session at the ASA conference you can contact Vincent Jeffries, California State University, Northridge (
vcjeff@earthlink.net).
Join an important new American Sociological Association section
A new American Sociological Association section on ‘Altruism and Social Solidarity’ is now in formation. The section focuses on phenomena such as generosity, altruism, forgiveness, unlimited love, philanthropy, intergroup cooperation and universalizing solidarity. Please consider joining us to participate in the activities and to work toward realizing the goals set forth in our Mission Statement.
Mission Statement: Altruism and Social Solidarity section
The purpose of the section is to promote theoretical development and empirical research pertaining to altruism and social solidarity. In the broadest sense, this subject matter consists of activities intended to benefit the welfare of others. These activities span the micro-macro continuum, from individual, to interpersonal, to organizational, to global, in all their forms and processes. Attention is given to cultural and structural sources of altruism and social solidarity and both their anticipated consequences.
In today’s world beset with individual and intergroup discord and violence, the intrinsic scientific, policy and public relevance of this subject in helping the human community to construct ‘good societies’ is unquestionable. The work of the section promotes understanding of the condition necessary for a broad vision of the common good that includes all individuals and groups.
Section activities are directed towards establishing the discipline of sociology in the forefront of theoretical development and empirical testing in this essential interdisciplinary area of scientific investigation. These activities include the following: to provide for periodic regular exchanges of information at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association; to formally recognize outstanding theoretical, empirical and applied work in the field of altruism and social solidarity through annual awards; to link with other scientific groups working on psychological, cultural and genetic aspects of altruism and solidarity; to develop and augment a community of scholars dedicated to the study of altruism and social solidarity; to provide an ongoing social context and support system for efforts to gain greater knowledge and understanding of the nature, sources and effects of altruism and social solidarity; to encourage the investigation of the policy implications of this knowledge; and to facilitate the dissemination of information to publics regarding aspects of altruism and social solidarity that will benefit individual lives and the social organization of modern society.
Visit our section homepage
To join
The ASA website is www.asanet.org. From there go to ‘membership information’, then ‘join or renew’, and finally ‘join a section’. We are third on the list of sections: ‘Altruism and Social Solidarity (47)’. Check to join the section, then go to ‘payment’, which is only $5.
This morning Anthony Tomei chaired Wioletta Gradkowska from EU DG Research, John Healy from the Centre for Nonprofit Management Trinity College Dublin and myself, in what turned out to be a exciting debate with all participants in a crowded room about the state of, and future perspectives of, research about the foundation sector in Europe. We all basically agreed upon the idea that knowledge about the foundation sector in Europe is scarce, but very much needed. Anthony pointed out that reasons why include: the interest of foundations in evaluating their own practice, the interest of sector networks and platforms in presenting the sector’s impact to policy makers and potential partners, and the urgency of building critical thinking and reflection about the role of foundations in society from a European perspective.
Wioletta shared the perceived benefits of the FOREMAP project, including the identification of areas of improvement and effective action in the field of public-private research partnerships, and graphically concluded that “we understood where we misunderstood foundations”. John expanded on the difficulties of getting a pan-European view about philanthropy and proposed reinforcing the quality and international scope of some of the existing centers for research and teaching on philanthropy in Europe, rather than creating new ones.
The session provided me with the unique opportunity to share and test the research initiative that the Institute for Strategic Analysis of Foundations is undertaking about the Spanish foundation sector with smart colleagues and friends with an acute critical capacity. The research project of the INAEF, which is promoted by the Spanish Association of Foundations, focuses as much in generating knowledge about the sector as in communicating it to society. The first step is to generate a “map for the archipelago” (RESEARCH), that is to gather data about some 11.000 foundations (approx.) registered in the country and to use them to quantify the impact of the sector in terms of income, expenditures, business models, direct and indirect employment, volunteering, geographical distribution, profile of founders, beneficiaries, areas of activity etc. Our goal for the medium-term is to provide the sector with tools to build its capacity and evaluate its performance for continuous improvement (DEVELOPMENT). The long-term goal of the INAEF is to explain and grow the (perceived) value added by the sector to society (INNOVATION).
The debate that followed reminded us that a sustainable agenda for research about foundations in Europe requires not only the commitment of donors’ associations, supervisory entities, and statistical agencies, but also that of foundations with accountability and transparency. It also requires capturing the interest of mainstream academic researchers who are willing to apply their theoretical models to explaining the foundation sector. And it requires a focus on international comparability that starts with streamlining data gathering methodologies and exchanging best practices in philanthropic research, as we are already striving for from the European Research Network on Philanthropy.
My personal concluding remark would be that it also requires from all of us interested in researching the sector a new view of the forest of foundations: once we end up counting the trees, including the bonsais (so far we had no choice but to estimate the size of the forest from the couple sequoias existing), we should make an extra effort to understand the ecosystem where foundations enter in long-term relationships with the public and the business sectors, other nonprofit organizations, and civil society in general, and to understand how these relationships can ultimately generate social capital.